Wednesday, February 17, 2016

Popular CEO Metrics and Dimensional Models


Popular CEO Metrics and Dimensional Models

Company Name: Asian Paints Limited, India

Introduction:
Asian Paints Limited is a chemical manufacturing and distributing company headquartered in Mumbai, India. It’s an established company with a huge market cap focused on the areas of decorative and industrial paints, varnishes, primers and allied products. Whereas it carries its operations in India under this name, international operations are carried under its subsidiary Berger International Limited that operates in South-East Asia, gulf and some other regions. For its operations, the company relies on its manufacturing units in India and the vast network of dealer channels to which it supplies both directly and indirectly via authorized distributors. Its establishment dates back to 1942. The company trades on the Bombay Stock Exchange and has shown good financial figures over the decade. It has been showing steady growth in the stock market over the years. The company is led by Mr. KBS Anand who is the CEO and MD of the company. For the analysis of the performance of the company by higher management, figures like those on balance/income sheets might seem important, yet these are just the scorecard of the operational metrics that help derive these figures.
From the perspective of monitoring performance, following metrics would seem vital for analysis by the CEO of the company:

1.      On-time Delivery
This metric focuses on the customer attentiveness aspect of the company operations. It is targeted towards monitoring of the system that ensures delivery of the order received on a timely basis. Irregular delivery times have a tremendous potential to hamper the performance of the company as this would attract higher rates of customer attrition, which brings down the performance.
2.      Manufacturing Cycle times
This metric measures the time it takes for manufacturing unit to turn the raw material into finished goods since the time order is released to it. This would help in determining the strategies to offset the over stocking or lag in delivery times.
3.      Yield
This metric measures the percentage of products manufactured correctly the first time as desired in the contract. Any decisions regarding quality of production, machinery revision could be based on these.
4.      Customer returns
This metric helps in analyzing the product satisfaction amongst the customers. If this is high, it is highly likely the customer may move to some other company which is never desirable for the company.  
5.      Throughput
Measurement of the quantity of production per manufacturing unit or division. This helps in decisions about setting up of more units to fulfill the demand of the consumers.
6.      Utilization of capacity
This is the measurement of percentage of full capacity of the manufacturing units that is actually realized. It helps understand the shortcomings, if any in the production that would further help in the rectification of production problems.
7.      Inventory/ Turns
This is the measurement of amount of inventory required to garner a given cost of goods sold by the company. Higher management is always interested in maintaining an equilibrium between inventories stored and required so that cash is not over struck.
8.      Safety incidents
This is the measurement of accidental cases reported in the company. It is directed towards employee satisfaction. Had there been more incidents, the management needs to decide upon investment in safety mechanisms.
9.      Manufacturing cost/ Revenue %
This is a measurement of the total cost of products to the company as a percentage of revenue generated. This is highly visible metric towards higher profit margins and efforts need to be put in to ensure this ratio to be at minimum while maintaining the quality.
10.  Net Profit
The management needs to be aware of the net profit it has made to make conclusions for its performance over the previous fiscal periods in order to report to stakeholders of the company. It would also need to backtrack the flaws in case there is a decreasing slope observed.
11.  Productivity per Employee
Employee performance is measured by the revenues generated by the company’s operations divided by its strength of employees devoted towards a unit. It helps in formulation of employee policies.

It is worth noticing that this might not be a comprehensive list of all the metrics desired by the manufacturing sector CEO’s or this company in general. However, it lays down a big picture of what CEO’s need to consider while analyzing their company’s performance. These indicators then serve as trigger points in formulation of strategies and policies towards setting up of targets for the following fiscal periods and laying down means of achieving them.

Dimensional Model Analysis:

For the DW/BI capabilities into the analysis of company performance, each type of dimensional model (transactional, periodic snapshot and accumulating) would be used by various supply chain points. Retailers would lay interest on transactional and periodic snapshots while higher management would be more interested in combination of higher grain based models with roll-up capabilities.

The CEO of such a company would be interested in periodic snapshots with granularity of date dimension as monthly, quarterly and yearly for each of the modules of the supply chain individually. They would be able to identify bottlenecks such as lower production in the manufacturing sector or disturbance of equilibrium in inventory management from such a dimensional model. However, to gain knowledge of the complete picture of the company as a whole, an accumulating snapshot would also be required that explains the complete story behind the whole pipeline from purchase of raw material to delivery of the finished products to the customer. This would help emphasize upon the incentive strategies for employees and stakeholders.

Rolled-up visual trends from periodic snapshots would complement the story from the accumulating snapshot that would assist in closing in on the areas that require attention.

Popular Dimensions that would be necessarily needed are as follows:
Date
Customer
Warehouse
Manufacturing facility
Product
Logistics
…and others as per the specific requirements of analysis.

References:


Thursday, February 4, 2016

BI Tools Comparison


Popular BI/Analytics Tools

The software industry today has a lot of Business Intelligence & Analytics tools available in the market. The number has shifted to hundreds as compared to the late '90's where there were just a bunch of them. The product differentiation and features have added on to the growing popularity of this technology. This has not only helped the big industries in effective decision making but also the small ones. Almost all established industry units with even slightest capabilities in IT aim at utilization of benefits that these tools have to offer.

Whereas a general discussion on the best tools available would attract the factor of popularity, there are certainly many other factors that are certainly important to analyze from the perspective of right choice of the BI suite. One of the prominent ones being that of investment required. Whereas, a fortune 500 company would not have issues with expensive software suites, small and medium sized companies would want capabilities that would just suffice their business needs and not be heavy on the pocket at the same time. Another view that would support this is the technologies that a product would support. All the industries would of course not look at the products from big data analytics view for at least a decade from now.

Based on above cited factors and other prominent ones, the following comparison matrix highlights the rank of the popular BI tools available in market today based on certain important criterion and their importance to industry units globally.


Criteria
Weight
TIBCO
TABLEAU
QLIK
SAP BW
MS Power
Big Data Analytics
 30%
 9
 8
 7
 5
 6
Investment
 30%
 5
 4
 2
 5
 7
Collaboration
 20%
 8
 9
 7.5
 6
 7.9
Mobile BI
 10%
 7
9.5
 8
 6.8
 7.5
Visual Standards
 10%
 5.5
 9.5
 8
 7
 8







Points
 100%
 7.05
 7.3
 5.8
 5.58
 7.03
Rank

 2
 1
 4
 5
 3


The popular BI suites are ranked according to the weighted mean of the scores assigned to them on various criterion listed on the left. The descriptive explanation for each one of them is as follows:




1.     Big Data Analytics

The advent of Big Data and its analysis over the years has made its use quite ubiquitous. Today, the use of Big Data is not limited to large size industries. Even the small and medium industries are attracted towards the benefits offered by bigger, diverse data structures that have a fortune of useful information embedded in them. For this, the BI tool in use should have in built features that could handle terabytes of data, process them and put them into useful, easy-to-understand visualizations. For this important fact, it’s been assigned a weight of 30 %. TIBCO ranks the best amongst the tools analyzed due to its state-of-the-art abilities to handle big data. The prominent features of this product include:

Visualizing Data: quick to analyze and view caliber that offers interesting insights

Big Data Connectors: availability of in-memory, in-data source, and on-demand data access methods

Distributed Computing: In addition to query processing, statistical and machine learning algorithms can also be run easily


2.     Investment Per User

This criterion reflects the cost of purchasing a single-user license towards the concerned BI tool. It also reflects the Return-On-Investment (ROI) that the product suite has to offer based on user consensus and public forums. This feature is again a prominent one as it’s one of the major deciding factors for firms on the lookout for a BI suite. The extent of this factor magnifies when its cost is calculated organization wide wherein licenses need to be procured for hundreds or thousands of employees.
On this factor, QLIK is the most expensive whereas MS Power BI is the cheapest. (Low scores indicate that the tool is expensive as compared to ones with a higher score).
However, the exact cost could not be calculated or known without direct contact with the officials. Other products, such as TABLEAU, SAP and TIBCO rank moderately in this criterion.


3.     Collaboration Ability

Just like other technologies and their sharing abilities, today’s business user demands sharing ability on BI Platform as well. This feature comes into large-scale use especially in large organizations where there are large number of people involved in the decision making process. The collaborating and version feature on BI platforms ranks quite high in terms of criterion to choose a product.
On this criterion the product from TABLEAU ranks the highest. This suite includes sharing ability as well as the power to get the analyzed data and visualizations online. These may then be made public to be viewed by all or hidden from general public viewing.
Moreover, the collaborating feature by posting comments to be viewed by another user from the organization is access permission based thus ensuring security. SAP ranks the lowest on this one.


4.     Mobile BI

Mobile BI can be elaborated as the ability of mobile workforce to peep into business insights through use of BI and analytics on applications over mobile devices. This is not only an inherent advantage but also a kind of necessity these days. With the advancement of technology and more reliance on the use of mobile devices and applications, it’s almost inevitable that everyone around demands this functionality in the near future.
Tableau ranks at the top on this criterion. It has all the abilities that one could think of with respect to mobile technology. The drag-and-drop feature for almost every feature analysis makes this product in sync with the mobile requirements. Other products in comparison do have some capability but are definitely not at par with the offerings from Tableau.


5.     Visual Standards

This feature is a self- explanatory one that refers to the presentation standards of the BI product. Though one would think that this might be the decorative or finishing front after the in-depth analysis, yet the appeal to human mind comes only when they see what it is all about. The senior management in almost all the organizations today don’t want to exercise their brains and put in time understanding the charts and graphs provided to them. What is expected is that they should be able to make out and distinguish the trends and patterns just by a glimpse at it. Though this demands a great designing skill set on the analyst part. Here again, Tableau ranks the highest from our list of products being compared here. It has got nearly all the kinds of charts, graphs, maps etc. that can be manipulated by just a small strike-through by a mouse. Other products like Qlik also have competitive visuals and can be thought of as emerging leaders on this front.



References: www.youtube.com
                     www.google.com
                     http://www.softwareadvice.com/bi/
                     http://go.sap.com/product/analytics/
                    https://community.tableau.com/